IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Criminal Revision No.23 of 2026 Date of Decision: 8.5.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sher Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. N.K. Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner would be content and satisfied in case order laid challenge in the instant proceedings is kept in abeyance till the disposal of the criminal case regarding the FIR, which is subject matter of the present case. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to the aforesaid prayer and as such, present petition is disposed of with direction that till the final disposal of the criminal case against the petitioner, order 2 laid challenge in the instant proceedings shall not be given effect to, rather same shall abide by the outcome of the criminal case. May 8, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge