Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9696 (AP)

The God Neelakanteswara Swamy, v. Durgeswara Rao,

CC/2763/2026 · 2026-09-06

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010370312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2763/2026 Between: 1. THE GOD NEELAKANTESWARA SWAMY,, REP. BY ITS. DONORS GANGAVARAPU BRAHMANANDAM, GANGAVARAPU PERAIAH, R/O. NEMALIPURI VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. GANGAVARAPU BRAHMANANDAM,, S/O. VEERAIAH, R/O. NEMALIPURI VILLAGE RAJUPALEM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. GANGAVARAPU PERAIAH,, S/O. (LATE) VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. D.NO. 337, NEMALIPURI VILLAGE, RAJUPALEM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DURGESWARA RAO, The Mandal Tahsildar, Rajupalem Mandal, Rajupalem, Palnadu District, Erstwhile Guntur District - 522 412. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent Under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully, deliberately and intentional violation of the orders of this Honble Court, dated 25-02-2026 passed in W.P. No. 35742 of 2022, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KRANTHI KUMAR PASUMARTHI Counsel for the Contemnor: 2 1. SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Heard Mr. Kranthi Kumar Pasumarthi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Sushma Yaganti, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The instant contempt case is filed against the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.35742 of 2022 dated 25.02.2026. 3. When the matter has been taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the respondent has placed before the Court a copy of the order passed by the Tahsildar dated 08.07.2026. In terms of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.35742 of 2022 dated 25.02.2026, an opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, respondents and other interested parties. Thereafter, enquiry was conducted. After conducting the enquiry, the parties are advised to approach the competent Civil Court for adjudication of their grievance. 4. Having regard to the same and as the directions of this Court have been complied with, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 07.09.2026 ANI 4 83 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO:2763 of 2026 Dated:07.09.2026 ANI