[2026:RJ-JP:25069-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No. 1475/2025 In D. B. Criminal Appeal No.330/2025 URN: SOSA / 2902U / 2025 Naresh Son of Madan Lal, Aged 38 Years, Resident of Baas Kair- wada, Police Station-Malakhera, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar) ---Accused-Applicant Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siya Ram Sharma Ms. Gayatri Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Ad- dl.G.A., Mr. Aman Agarwal, AAAG and Ms. Neha Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 06/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the present accused-applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel appearing on behalf of the accused-applicant sub- mits that the accused-applicant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence under Section 302 IPC. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that accused-applicant was on bail during trial. Counsel further [2026:RJ-JP:25069-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1475/2025] submits that recovery has been made after 10 days of FIR and hearing/disposal of appeal is likely to take long time. Therefore, he prays that sentence awarded to the accused-applicant may be suspended and the accused-applicant be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Government Advocate cum Additional Advocate General has opposed the application for suspension of sentence and submitted that weapon of offence i.e. Gandasa has been re- covered at the information of the accused-applicant on which hu- man blood was also found. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the fact that recovery of the weapon has been made at the instance of the accused-applicant and consider- ing the statement of father of the deceased, no case is made out to allow the suspension of sentence application. 7. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous sus- pension of sentence application is accordingly dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Gourav/14