Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9688 (CAL)

MARSHALL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PVT. LTD. v. AAMAL KUMAR GHOSH

CPAN/265/2003 · 2026-04-17

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

April 17, 2026 Sl. No.3 Court No.1 s.biswas CPAN 265 of 2003 In FMA 3171 of 2002 With CAN 1 of 2002 (Old No.CAN 9638/2002) Marshall Development Company Pvt. Ltd. vs. Amal Kumar Ghosh and another Mr. Amitava Mitra ... for the petitioner Dictated by Partha Sarathi Sen, J. 1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner submits before this court that with the intervention of common friends, the disputes between the parties have been settled out of the court. 2. In view of such, it is submitted on behalf of the writ petitioner that the instant contempt application may be dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the writ petitioner, CPAN 265 of 2003 is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. With the dismissal of the instant contempt application, the interlocutory 2 application(s), if therebe any, is/are hereby dismissed. 5. Interim order, if any, stands hereby vacated. (Sujoy Paul, C.J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)