1 ( 2026:HHC:16363 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.434 of 2026 Date of Decision: 13.05.2026 ___________________________________________________ Ravinder Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus M. Sudha Devi and another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate (through Video Conferencing). For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, learned Additional Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He has placed on record communication dated 29.04.2026, alongwith copy of office order dated 10.04.2026, wherein it has been stated that the judgment under reference stood complied with and the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:16363 ) 2. In this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail the consideration order in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) May 13, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)