Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9685 (AP)

M.JAYAPRASAD v. STATE OF AP

CRLRC/268/2019 · 2026-09-14

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010068782019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 268/2019 Between: 1. M.JAYAPRASAD, R/O BHATTIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI. 2. NALLAMOTHU SAMBASIVA RAO, D.NO.18-4-21, MUTYAMSETTIPALEM, TENALI, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. AKULA VAMSI KRISHNA 3. LEGAL AID The Court made the following: ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and the learned Legal Aid Counsel. 2. Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present. 2 3. Smt.Kalla Tulasi Durgamba, learned Counsel, is appointed as the Mediator in this case. 4. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee is directed to issue the necessary proceedings in this regard. 5. In view of the Mediator's report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Repalle, in C.C.No.18 of 2015, dated 26.04.2017, as confirmed by the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tenali, in Crl.A.No.232 of 2017, dated 06.03.2019, are hereby set aside. As a result, the Petitioner/Accused is acquitted under Section 320(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘the Cr.P.C.’). There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 15.09.2026 BMS