Pravin @ Praveenkumar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Kattuputhur
CRL OP(MD)/22929/2025 · 2026-01-07
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 96821 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 96821 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025
1. Pravin @ Praveenkumar,
2. Mugesh @ Mugesh Kanna ... Petitioners/Accused
Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Thiruchirappalli District. Crime No. 611 of 2025 ... Respondent/Complainant (Amended as per order of this Court dated 16.12.2025 in Crl.M.P(MD).No.20150 of 2025)
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Suresh Kannan For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj,
Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025 PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 611 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :-
The petitioners/Accused, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act (Corresponding offences undr Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.611 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The prosecution's case is that the petitioners along with other accused persons, had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also attacked him due to which, he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025 as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that there are no previous case pending against the petitioners and the injured person has been discharged from the hospital. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case pending against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thottiyam, Thiruchirappalli District, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order and on further conditions that: [a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioners shall stay at Madurai and report before the Inspector of Police, Thallagullam Police Station, Madeira, daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of one month and thereafter, report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025 with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
(S S Y J)
07.01.2026 TTA TO
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Thottiyam, Thiruchirappalli District. 2.Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Thiruchirappalli District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22929 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J TTA
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22929 of 2025 Date : 07/01/2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis