HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33892 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Bratendra Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant hands up supplementary affidavit explaining the criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant, Sri Manindra Mohan Pandey, learned advocate, holding the brief, appeared for the informant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Karan Saini to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 250 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 131, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS, P.S.- Kurawali, District- Mainpuri, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 18.06.2026 lodged by one of the injured with the allegation against six named persons including the applicant with the allegation that the accused persons had assaulted the informant and his friend Vijay, Vipul, Anurag and Gajendra with iron rod and sharp edged weapon. It is the contention of learned counsel that four person including the informant had suffered simple injuries whereas Gajendra one of the injured suffered fracture of the ulna bone which is the only grievous injury sustained by the injured. It is further contended that the informant and other injured came to the village of the accused applicant under the influence of liquor and were creating ruckus which had led to the altercation between them and assault. The assault was not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bratendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Pankaj Dwivedi Karan Saini .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) made with the intention to commit murder but it was the deterrent to drag the informant and other injured from the areas. Further contended that the other co-accused have already been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court and by this Court. Further contended that the accused applicant has three cases criminal history and in all the cases, he is on bail. Investigation is continuing. The applicant is co-operating in the investigation. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 31.07.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the number and nature of injuries and that none suffered the injury by the sharp edged weapon, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 23, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 33892 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad