Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9676 (CHH)

SANJEEV KUMAR CHAUHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3772/2026 · 2026-04-29

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20095 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3772 of 2026 1 - Sanjeev Kumar Chauhan S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Chauhan Aged About 41 Years R/o H. No. 42, Shiv Kumar, Tarri Road, Bagdehi Para, Ward No. 16, Nawapara, Gobra Nawapara, District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Commercial Tax (Rajya Kar), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner State Tax (Rajya Kar), Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Assistant Commissioner State Tax (Rajya Kar), Raipur Circle 12, Gariaband, District Gariaband Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Ms. Anushree Mishra, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Vivek Verma, G.A.. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 30/04/2026 1. On objection being raised by learned State counsel that petitioner is having efficacious alternate remedy to file proceedings before the Labour Court, learned counsel for petitioner after arguing for sometime, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy available to petitioner under law. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 2. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for parties, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to petitioner to avail alternate remedy of under law. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram