HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5565 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Mr. Akhilesh Bharti, the learned counsel for petitioners and the learned AGA representing State respondents 1,2 & 3. 2. Perused the record. 3. Petitioners Smt. Sindhu Kumari and another have approached this Court by means of present Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 21.02.2026 lodged by first informant respondent 4 Ramawadh Gaud and registered as Case Crime No. 0039 of 2026, under Section 87 B.N.S., Police Station Seorahi, District Kushinagar. 4. After some arguments, the learned counsel for petitioners fairly gave up the prayer prayed for by means of present writ petition. It is however contended by the learned counsel for petitioners that interest of justice shall better be served in case the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to Court below to consider the bail application of petitioners in the light of law laid down by Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCC 51. 5. Learned A.G.A. representing State respondents 1,2&3 does not oppose the aforesaid fair submission urged by the learned counsel for petitioners. 6. We do not find any legal impediment for not accepting the fair submission urged by the learned counsel for petitioner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Bharti, Kamlesh Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sindhu Kumari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Accordingly, the prayer prayed for by means of present writ petition is refused. 8. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned A.G.A. for State respondents 1,2&3, upon perusal of record and considering the submissions urged by the learned counsel for petitioner as noted herein above, we dispose of this writ petition finally with a direction that in case petitioners appear before Court below and apply for bail, then their bail application shall be considered by Court below in the light of law laid down by Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). 9. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. April 20, 2026 Arif CRLP No. 5565 of 2026 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad