Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 96668 (MAD)

Kal Media Services Private Limited v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, IPREC

CRL MP(MD)/20430/2025 · 2026-01-21

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL MP(MD). No.20430 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL MP(MD). No.20430 of 2025 in CRL OP(MD). No.16903 of 2025 Kal Media Services Private Limited, Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.M.Raja, Murasoli Maran, No.73, Mrc Nagar Main Road, Mrc Nagar, Chennai 600 028. ... Petitioners/Accused Vs 1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Iprec, Dindigul. 2. Sai Siva K.G. Sivasubramaniam, S/o. V.S.Govindarajan, ... Respondents/Complainants For Petitioner : Mr.C.Arun Kumar For R1 : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD). No.20430 of 2025 PRAYER :- To Cancel the Anticipatory Bail granted to the 2nd respondent in Crl.OP.(MD).No.16903/2025 dated 06.10.2025 on the file of this Court in connection with Crime No.14/2025 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The first contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail is that the petitioner had mistakenly mentioned the Crime No. 4 of 2025 instead of Crime No.14 of 2025. This Court is of the considered opinion that the same is only a typographical error. 2. The second contention is that the respondent police was wrongly mentioned in the main petition. A perusal of the records shows that the petitioner filed an amendment petition to correct the description of the respondent police and the same was allowed by this Court on 10.10.2025. Therefore, the second contention is rejected. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD). No.20430 of 2025 3. The third contention is that till date, the petitioner has not surrendered before the concerned Court and has not executed the sureties. It is seen from the records that the petitioner filed an extension petition and the same was allowed by this Court on 21.01.2026, granting further time to comply with the conditions. Therefore, the third contention is also rejected. 4. This Court has considered all the contentions raised by the petitioner and the same have been rejected. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. (S S Y J) 21.01.2026 tta To, Inspector of Police, IPREC, Dindigul. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL MP(MD). No.20430 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J tta ORDER in CRL MP(MD) No.20430 of 2025 Date : 21/01/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis