Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9658 (CHH)

NEHA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3515/2026 · 2026-04-30

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:20578 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3515 of 2026 • Neha Sahu D/o Ashok K Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o 2nd Floor, B.G.-2/G- 5, Rajaswa Colony, Dingapur, Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Food Distribution And Consumer Protection Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Controller Legal Metrology Department Indravati Bhawan Block 2, 3rd Floor, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent- State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 01/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the respondents-State submits that in pursuance of the previous date of hearing on 23.04.2026, he has sought instructions in the matter and according to his instructions, suspension of petitioner vide order of suspension dated 05.12.2025 has been revoked vide order dated 24.04.2026. In support of his submission, he handed over copy of order dated 24.04.2026 upon the counsel for petitioner as also placed before this Court for perusal. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in this writ petition petitioner has challenged the order of her suspension dated 05.12.2025. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA Date: 2026.05.02 11:04:23 +0530 2 / 2 However, in the facts of the case and revocation of her order of suspension, she may be granted liberty to challenge the said order with regard to her posting, if she so desires. 3. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nothing remains in this writ petition for adjudication of this Court in view of the order dated 24.04.2026. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the order dated 24.04.2026, if any grievance still subsists. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn