1 2026:CGHC:20141 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8811 of 2022  Dheeraj Prasad Suryavanshi S/o Banshilal Suryavanshi Aged About 54 Years (Desable / Mental) Through His S/o Roshan Suryavanshi, Aged About 22 R/o Village Chorha Devri Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Pashu Chikitsa Vibhag Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director Department Of Pashu Chikitsa Vibhag, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Dy. Director Officer Of Dy. Directir, Pashu Chikitsa Services, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh 4. Collector Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate For State : Mr. Anway Tiwari, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 30.04.2026 1) By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought following reliefs:- (i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the record for the entire service record from the Respondents Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2026.04.30 17:08:12 +0530 2 Authorities for kind perusal. (ii) That, the Hon'ble Court please to quash the impugned suspension order dated 24.11.2008 and passed the order to be continued the service of petitioner father Dheeraj Prasad Suryavanshi. (iii) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly please to issue the order, direction to the respondents to be release thesuspension allowance to the petitioner from the date of suspension order. (iv) Any other appropriate relief may also be granted in case as may deem fit by the Hon'ble Court as per the facts and circumstances of the case, 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that initially petitioner’s father was appointed to the post of Chowkidar under respondent department vide order dated 30.5.1992 and his services were transferred to various places during the service tenure and at the relevant time he was posted at Kritrim Garbhdharan Kendra, Mungeli. He further submits that petitioner’s father remained absent from service and on the basis of a complaint, he was placed under suspension vide order dated 24.11.2008 and he has not been paid salary/subsistence allowance since 2008. He contends that mental status of petitioner’s father is not sound and sufficient medical documents have been placed to substantiate the same. He further contends that according to circular dated 1.10.2005 issued by the State Government, mentally and physically retarded persons are entitled for all benefits and their services cannot be terminated on account of their disability. He argues that petitioner may be 3 permitted to make representation before respondent No. 3 and the said authority may be directed the decide such representation expeditiously. 3) On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that petitioner’s father did not approach the respondent authorities along with relevant documents therefore salary has not been paid to him. He further submits that petitioner’s father remained absent without any authorization therefore he is not entitled for salary or other benefits. He contends that this petition petition is misconceived and deserves to be dismissed. 4) I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5) Relevant paragraph of the circular dated 1.10.2005 reads as under :- 9. मानसिक अथवा शारीरिरीक निःनशाक्तत क करीण रीकरी वा मा स्थाई रूप  अक्ष्मा हो जान वाले रीकरी वाक क अमाथ घोनिः!त नहो" निःकया जा कत छत्तीसगढ़ शासन, समान्य प्रशासन विभाग रायपुरा न अपुन ज्ञापुन क्रमाक एफ, 16-2/2004/1/3, दिनक 1 अक्टू बरा, 2005 द्वारा यह विनर्ण%य प्रसरिरात विकय ह( विक क)ई भा कय%लय विकस ऐस कमा%चारा ब) सय. समाप्त नह0 कराग जो) स क 2रान विन3शाक्त ह) जोत ह( औरा इस प्रकरा विन3शाक्त ह) जोन ल कमा%चारा यदि अपुन धारिरात पु क लिलए उपुयक्त नह0 ह(, त) उस समान तनमान औरा स प्रसविधाओं ल विकस अन्य पु पुरा स्थानन्तरिरात विकय जो सकत ह(। यदि ऐस कमा%चारा क) विकस भा पु पुरा समाय)जिजोत विकय जोन सभा नह0 ह( त) उस उपुयक्त पु उपुलब्ध ह)न तक अथ अधिधार्षिABकC आय पु र्ण% ह)न तक, इनमा. स जो) भा पुहल ह), अधिधासख्य (सपुरान्य मारारा) पु पुरा राखा जोए। इस प्रकरा विन3शाक्तत क आधारा पुरा पु)न्नवित स भा सलिचात नह0 करान क आशा ह(। यह आशा भारात सराकरा, समाजिजोक न्यय तथ अधिधाकरिरात मात्रालय द्वारा विन3शाक्त व्यक्तिक्त अधिधाविनयमा, 1995 कC धारा 47 क 4 विकय गय सशा)धान क आधारा पुरा जोरा विकय गय हK। 6) Perusal of medical documents annexed to the writ petition would show that mental status of petitioner’s father is not sound but at the same time sight cannot be lost to the fact that he remained absent from the duties unauthorizedly and salary for that period has not been paid to him. 7) Taking into consideration the above-discussed facts, this petition is hereby being disposed reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to make a representation before the Deputy Director, Pashu Chikitsa Services, Korba i.e. respondent No.3 in light of circular dated 1.10.2005 within period of 30 days from today. It is expected that the authority concerned shall consider and decide such representation, if so preferred by the petitioner within period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of the same. 8) With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a