H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 Panneerselvam ... Petitioner/Detenu -vs- 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its, The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Magistrate and District Collector, Office of the District Magistrate and District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Trichy Central Prison, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records, connected with the detention order of the Respondent No.2 in Detenntion Order P.D.O.No.15/2025 dated 10.03.2025 and quash the same and direct ____________ p. 2 H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 the respondents to produce the body or person of the detenu by name Panneerselvam, son of Somasundaram, aged about 54 years, now confirming as “Sexual Offender” at Trichy Central Prison before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith. For Petitioner : Dr.R.Alagumani For Respondents : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) The petitioner is the detenu viz., Panneerselvam, son of Somasundaram, aged about 54 years. The detenu has been detained by the second respondent by his order in P.D.O.No.15/2025, dated 10.03.2025, holding him to be a "Sexual Offender", as contemplated under Section 2(ggg) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this habeas corpus petition. 2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority. ____________ p. 3 H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner raised a ground that some of the pages served on the detenu are illegible. 4. On perusal of the booklet revealed that the booklet is very clear and legible. 5. In view of the above, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order of detention passed by the second respondent and it is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this habeas corpus petition is dismissed. [G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.] 03.02.2026 am NCC :Yes/No Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ____________ p. 4 H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Magistrate and District Collector, Office of the District Magistrate and District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Trichy Central Prison, Trichy District. 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ____________ p. 5 H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J. AND R. POORNIMA,J. am H.C.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2025 03.02.2026 ____________