Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9654 (KAR)

CFC HOTEL v. RAMAMURTHY A

WP/33021/2024 · 2026-02-12

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8572 WP No. 33021 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 33021 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: CFC HOTEL OFFICE AT 4/6 GROUND FLOOR RAMAMURTHY COMPLEX BENGALURU - 560 042 2ND CROSS, KAMARAJ ROAD OPP. COMMERCIAL STREET REP. BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR. DANIEL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAGHUNATH M.D., ADVOCATE) AND: RAMAMURTHY A. AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS S/O. LATE SRI T.V. ANNASWAMY R/A. NO.1, KINGSTON STREET RICHMOND ROAD BENGALURU - 560 025. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRADYUMNA L.NARASIMHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI M.V. SUNDARARAMAN FOR C/R, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.10.2024 PASSED IN COMM.O.S.NO.788/2024 BY LXXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-85) AT ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8572 WP No. 33021 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for caveator/respondent files a copy of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.32930/2024, wherein defendant No.6 has challenged the similar order, which is challenged by defendant No.7 in this petition. The said writ petition came to be rejected and the same is placed on record. 3. Today, the matter is coming on for rectification of the objections raised by Registry for the fifth time. 4. On the previous date i.e. on 25.11.2025, this Court has passed the following order: "A week's time is granted to rectify the office objections, failing which, list this matter for dismissal." 5. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this petition, which may be for the reason that - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8572 WP No. 33021 of 2024 the Coordinate petition filed by defendant No.6 has been rejected. Under the circumstances, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7