20/04 2026 AD/09/24 266312 NANDY (DISMISSED) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/26818/2025 FAZLUL HAQUE MOLLA VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Sounak Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Naskar, Advocate Mr. Md. Jannat Ul Firdous, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. K.J. Yusuf, Advocate Mr. Saurav Chaudhuri, Advocate ……for the State Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Sr. Advocate Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Advocate Ms. Pramiti Bandopadhyay, Advocate Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Advocate Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate ……for the WBCSSC 1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that his prior teaching experience has not been considered and marks have not been allotted to him. The petitioner had however, not mentioned his prior teaching experience at the time of filling up the form. 3. Mr. Singh, learned Advocate appearing for the Commission refutes the submission of the Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner have the prior teaching experience as specified under Schedule-II A(2)(b) of the Notification No. WB(Part-I)/2025/SAR-247 dated 29.05.2025. 4. The petitioner was merely a para-teacher who had been teaching students of Class-VIII. Thus, the petitioner’s inability to mention his prior teaching experience in the form coupled with the fact that he does not have the requisite qualification to apply for prior teaching experience, are reasoned enough to reject the writ-petition. 5. The writ-petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2