LPA 379/2026 $~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 379/2026 SEWA SINGH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Arvind Gupta, Mr. C. Parkash, Mr. Ramesh Kalsan, Ms. Anushree Rawat, Mr. Manav Kumar & Mr. Ishan, Advocates along with Appellant-in-Person. versus NEERAJ KUMAR JINDAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Goyal & Mr. M. Minhal Mehdi, Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 11. Mr. Sagar Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.12/Municipal Corporation of Delhi. Mr. S.S. Surana- CGSC along with Mr. Sarthak Rana- G.P. & Mr. Waseem Ahmed & Mr. Akhil Tomar, Advocates for Respondent Nos.13 & 14/The Commissioner, Delhi Police & Station House Officer respectively. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 18.05.2026 CM APPL. 33588/2026 (Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:45:27 LPA 379/2026 LPA 379/2026 3. Heard the learned Counsels for the Parties. 4. By the impugned order dated 27.04.2026 (“Impugned Order”), learned Single Judge has noticed the status report filed by Respondent No. 12 / Municipal Corporation of Delhi wherein it was stated that some temporary encroachment on the pavement at the site in question was there which shall be removed on 01.04.2026. 5. The learned Single Judge also notices the photographs enclosed with the said status report and records and have perused that the said photographs reveals that the encroachment had been completely removed. 6. In the impugned order, learned Single Judge has also recorded the statement made on behalf of the learned Counsel representing the Police Authorities as well and has accordingly records that the grievance of the Respondents – Petitioners stood redressed. 7. The Appellant was present before the learned Single Judge in the proceedings of the Writ Petition and undertook that he shall not carry out any activity which causes public nuisance or is in the nature of encroachment on a pavement. 8. The learned Counsel for the Appellant has stated that the said undertaking has to be construed only to mean that in case the Appellant indulges in Guru sewa or langar, it would not cause any public nuisance or encroachment on the pavement and further that it should not mean that the Appellant ever undertook not to undertake Guru sewa or langar. 9. We do not find any reason to interfere in the Impugned Order passed by the learned Single Judge, however, we only clarify that it will be permissible for the Appellant to undertake Guru sewa or any other such charitable activity within the bounds of law and in a manner, which will not This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:45:27 LPA 379/2026 cause any inconvenience to the residents of the residential colonies concerned. 10. The Appeal, thus, stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations. Pending Application also stands disposed of. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J MAY 18, 2026/ ‘A’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/05/2026 at 12:45:27