RAJESH HANSDA @ RAJESH HANSDAK v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3721/2026 · 2026-05-04
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9651 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9651 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(2026:JHHC:13044) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3721 of 2026
Rajesh Hansda @ Rajesh Hansdak, aged about 27 years, s/o Sri Bivishan Hansda, r/o Sirwadhi, PO & PS – Shikaripara, District - Dumka.
… … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand.
… … …Opp. Party ------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Mahto, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------
Order No:- 04, Dated:- 04th May, 2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jama P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in theft of 29 solar panels installed in Panchayat Lagala. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and was implicated in this case only on the basis of their self-confessional statement in Shikaripara P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025 leading to recovery of stolen computer and peripherals. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.10.2025 as mentioned in para-22 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 24.04.2026 in B.A. No. 3419 of 2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. First Class, Dumka, in connection with Jama P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025, with the condition that they will cooperate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 04.05.2026 Aditi