Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 96503 (MAD)

M.R.Gopal v. S.Parvathy

CMP(MD)/19970/2025 · 2026-02-20

N Senthilkumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 20/02/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 in CRP(MD).SR.No.106165 of 2025 M.R.Gopal ... Petitioner Vs 1. S.Parvathy 2. B.Diana Mary 3. State Bank of India, Through the Authorized Officer, V.Pitchiah, Having Office At Salai Road, Dindigul District. ... Respondents PRAYER in CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 :- To Condone the delay of 637 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 22.11.2023 in EA No.44 of 2020 in EP No.148 of 2020 in OS No. 88 of 2016 on the file of Principal District Court, Dindigul and thus render justice. PRAYER in CRP(MD).SR.No.106165 of 2025:- Civil Revision Petition filed to set aside the order, dated 22.11.2023 in EA No.44 of 2020 in EP No.148 of 2020 in OS No.88 of 2016 on the file of Principal District Court, Dindigul and thus render justice. For Petitioner : M.Gnana Guru Nathan, 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 For Respondents : Mr.G. Gomathi Sankar – R2 Mr. S. Anwar Samem – R3 Mr. Nitheesh – R1 (legal aid counsel) ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 637 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 22.11.2023 made in E.A. No. 44 of 2020 in E.P. No. 148 of 2020 in O.S. No. 88 of 2016 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is aged and bedridden due to illness. 3. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that no sufficient reasons have been assigned to explain the delay. In the absence of any reasonable explanation, such an application for condonation of delay cannot be entertained. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 4. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for want of merits. Consequently, CRP(MD) Sr. No. 106165 of 2025 is rejected at the SR stage itself. 20.02.2026 trp 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 N. SENTHILKUMAR,J CMP(MD). No.19970 of 2025 in CRP(MD).SR.No.106165 of 2025 Date : 20/02/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis