Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 965 (GAU)

MD REZZAKUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./2606/2025 · 2026-01-26

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010179412025 2026:GAU-AS:840 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2606/2025 MD REZZAKUL ISLAM S/O MD. ABDUL SAMAD, PRESENT RESIDENT OF VILL- SNK DARRANGA, P.S. TAMULPUR DIST. TAMULPUR, ASSAM PERMANENT RESIDENT OF CHAPOR BORI, P.S. SARTHEBARI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SAIKIA, MD IMRAN,MR S M ABDULLAH P,B DEKA,MR. A S ALI,MR. N K DAS,MR T KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 27.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. T. Kalita, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. K. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in respect of Special NDPS Case No.08/2023, under Sections 22(b)/22(c)/25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Baksa, Mushalpur. Page No.# 2/2 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that there are 13 (thirteen) witnesses shown in the Charge-Sheet, out of whom 12 (twelve) have already been examined and one remains to be examined. 4. I have also considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. This Court is of the opinion that at this stage, allowing the petitioner to go on bail will definitely hamper early disposal of the case before the Trial Court. 6. Therefore, the Bail Application is found to be without any merit at this stage and stands dismissed accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant