[2026:RJ-JP:25504] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7648/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13930U / 2026 Hansraj S/o Bahadur Mal Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dhani Aadameda, Tan Guwar, Police Station Sadar Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vidhut Kumar Gupta Ms. Manisha Solera For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.242/2025 registered at Police Station Neem Ka Thana Sadar, District Sikar for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2). 307 and 189(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that from the material available on record, none of the injuries allegedly caused by the petitioner was inflicted on any vital part of the body of the injured, Subhash. It is further argued that there is no medical [2026:RJ-JP:25504] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7648/2026] opinion on record to establish that the injuries sustained by the injured were dangerous to life. It is also submitted that the co- accused, Kapil Gurjar, has already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.05.2026. The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 06.07.2025. Though one criminal antecedent has been reported against the petitioner but he has already been granted bail in the said case. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has contended that the injuries sustained by the injured are grievous in nature and have adversely affected his ability to perform his day-to-day activities. It is further submitted that the petitioner fired the weapon with the intention of causing injuries to the injured. Therefore, having regard to the gravity and seriousness of the offence, it is argued that the petitioner is not entitled to the benefit of bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Hansraj S/o Bahadur Mal Gurjar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two [2026:RJ-JP:25504] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7648/2026] sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 15/Arun