Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9648 (ORI)

CHHABILA NAYAK v. STATE OF ORISSA

WP(C)/3654/2026 · 2026-02-10

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C ) No.3654 of 2026 Chhabila Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. L.K. Mohanty, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 10.02.2026 2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer: It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opp parties calling upon them to file show cause as to as to why:- i) a direction shall not be issued to the opp parties specially opp.party no.2 to revise the pay of the petitioner by grating grade pay of Rs.4800/- as 2nd RACP benefit w.e.f. 1.1.2013 taking note of the earlier order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(c) No.15558 of 2024 dated 05.07.2024 under Annexure-10 and the consequential order passed by the opp.party no.1 dated 29.05.2025 under Annexure 11 and accordingly re-fix/ revise the pay and pension along with pensionary benefit in favour of the petitioner w.e.f. 1.12.2023. ii) After hearing the parties be pleased to direct the opp.party no.2 to revise the pay of the petitioner by granting grade pay of Rs.4800/- as 2nd RACP w.e.f. 1.1.2013 and release all the arrears till his superannuation dated 30.11.2023. Thereafter the pension papers be revised w.e.f. 1.12.2023 and transmitted the revised pension paper to Opp. party No.4 for revision of pension and pensionary benefit w.e.f 1.12.2023. (iii) The opp. parties be directed to calculate and release all arrears of the Petitioner; within a date to be fixed by this Hon’ble court. And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that request available at Annexure-13 to the Writ Petition is pending before Opp. Party No.2, but till date nothing has been done in the matter. In such background, Petitioner prays that a direction be issued to Opp. Party No.2 to take a decision on the above noted request within a specific time period. 5. Considering the submissions made and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court while disposing the Writ Petition directs Opposite Party No.2 to consider and dispose of the request so available at Annexure-13 to the Writ Petition in accordance with law, taking into account the order passed by the Government under Annexure-11 to the Writ Petition, within a period of three six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of this order, if the same has not yet been disposed of and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner. Petitioner is directed to provide a copy of this order along with a copy of Annexure-11 before Opp. party No.2 for compliance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) sangita Judge