Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9648 (ALL)

RAJESH PAL AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14866/2026 · 2026-09-22

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14866 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed today by Saurabh Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of respondent no.4 is taken on record. 2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the Advertisement No.17- Pariksha/2026 for the post of Pashudhan Prasar Adhikari Mukhya Pariksha ( प्रा0अ0प0)/17 dated 10.8.2026, issued by the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Services Selection Commission, Lucknow. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that against the earlier selection held in the year 2014, several writ petitions are pending and interim order have been passed and till then, the aforesaid writ petitions are not decided, therefore, no fresh advertisement should have been made. 4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is wholly misconceived. Earlier selection is nothing to do with the present advertisement. 5. The writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed. September 23, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rajesh Pal And 11 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad