Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9646 (RAJ)

BHAJANLAL S/O SHRI GIRRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10326/2026 · 2026-07-08

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:25562] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10326/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19125U / 2026 Bhajanlal S/o Shri Girraj, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Tankoli, Police Station Koh, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.L. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/07/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.73/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar Deeg, District Deeg for offences under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation against the present petitioner is that a large quantity of illicit liquor, as mentioned in the FIR, along with a sum of Rs. 37,610/-, was recovered from his conscious possession. However, the petitioner was not found present at the spot at the time of the alleged recovery. It is further submitted that from the conscious possession of the co-accused, namely, Kanhaiya, Jagdish Prasad [2026:RJ-JP:25562] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10326/2026] Sharma, and Lokendra Singh, similar contraband liquor was also recovered. The said co-accused have already been granted the benefit of bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 12.05.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 15.06.2026. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Bhajanlal S/o Shri Girraj, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 48/Arun