Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9645 (ALL)

SUSHILA MAURYA v. STATE OF UP AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15524/2026 · 2026-09-23

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15524 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "a writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the UP- Subordinate Service Selection Commission, Lucknow to treat the petitioner as a duly qualified candidate for the post of Health Worker (Mahila) in pursuance to notification no.11 - Examination/2024 after awarding 15 marks to the petitioner on the basis of her contractual service under District Program Manager (National Health Mission), Chandauli. a writ, order or direction of a suitable nature commanding the respondent to permit the petitioner participation in the process of document verification and recommendations of her name for appointment after taking into account the aforesaid weightage of marks on contractual service rendered by the petitioner." 2. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that because on the experience certificate, a wrong roll number has been mentioned, claim for experience is not being considered by the Commission. In this regard, it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed a representation. 3. Shri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Commission has submitted that Commission has no role in this matter, whatever the material is provided by the State Government, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Siddharth Khare, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Sushila Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Commission has act upon the same for further verification. In case wrong roll number has been mentioned in the certificate issued by respondents No.3 and 4, the same can be corrected by both the authorities and thereafter respondent no.2 has to verify the same and send it to the Commission for further consideration. 4. In view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach respondents no.3 and 4 within three days from today for redressal of her grievances and in case petitioner approaches respondents no.3 and 4 within time stipulated, her grievances will be considered and decided within a week thereafter by respondents No.3 and 4, in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. 5. 5. In case certificate is corrected, the same will be forwarded to respondent no.2 for further action. 6. After verification of the same, respondent no. 2 shall forward the same before U.P. Subordinate Service Selection Commission, Lucknow and this exercise has to be completed within a period of one week from the date on which respondent no. 2 receive the certificate from respondent no. 3 & 4. September 24, 2026 Rishabh WRIA No. 15524 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad