Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9643 (UTT)

TASEEN AND OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA

WPMS/2602/2026 · 2026-08-25

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010150762026 2026:UHC:7734 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2602/2026 Taseen And Others --Petitioner Versus Union Of India --Respondent Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Petitioner has questioned the action of the Authorities for laying gas pipeline on the Chuk road. It is contended that gas pipeline can only be taken through main road and not from the Chuk road. 4. This Court is not impressed by the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. There is no law or policy shown to the Court, which supports the contention of the petitioner. 5. In such view of the matter, the writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 25.08.2026 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f0747 7005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10 C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A585 31726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2026.08.25 05:56:06 -07'00'