Smt. Ippagunta Koteswari, v. The Superintendent Engineer,
WP/15579/2016 · 2026-09-10
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9642 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 9642 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010464472016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15579/2016 Between:
1. SMT. IPPAGUNTA KOTESWARI,, W/O. I.V. KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE AND RESIDENT OF SANGAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH SONTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD., NELLORE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULT NELLORE DISTRICT
2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD., SANGAM VILLAGE, SANGAM MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE ELECTRICAL CIRCLE INSPECTOR VIGILANCE, ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LTD.; NELLORE, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, SANGAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, SANGAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SMT KAKU BUJJAMMA, W/O. KAKU VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: HOTEL BUSINESS AND RESIDENT OF SANGAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT. 2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, Order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1, 2 and 4 in granting 3 electricity service connections to the 5th respondent for the land belongs to the Petitioner covered by Plot No. 22 in survey No. 367/2 of Sangam Village and Mandal, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore District without following the procedure and contrary to Regulations and ekren though 5th respondent has no right or title on the said Plot is arbitfary, unreasonable and accordingly direct the respondents 1, 2 and 4 to consider the representation of the Petitionier through her legal notice dated 19-3-2016 by disconnecting the power supply of the electricity connections bearing service Nos. 2931, 368o and 3370 granted in the name of the 5th respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 19284 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner throtiih her legal notice dated 19-3-2016 by taking necessary action as per law by disconnecting the electricity supply of the service connections Nos.
2931, 3680 and 3370 issued in the name of the 5th respondent, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
2. K NARSI REDDY
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.15579 OF 2016
ORDER:
1. Sri K. Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date: 11-09-2026
BSM
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.15579 OF 2016
Date 11-09-2026
W
BSM