Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 964 (UTT)

MOHD ARIF v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/90/2025 · 2026-01-03

Alok Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:97 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 03.01. 2026 ABA No.90 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel (through video conferencing) for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, has requested on instruction to permit the applicant Mohd. Arif to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with a liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court. 3. The said request has not been opposed by the respondent. 4. The present Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA No.90 of 2025) is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the applicant to file anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court, but in accordance with the law. (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 03.01.2026 Pant/