Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9631 (UTT)

KULVINDAR KAUR v. DIVISIONAL HEAD

WPMS/2425/2026 · 2026-08-14

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010140782026 2026:UHC:7254 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2425/2026 Kulvindar Kaur --Petitioner Versus Divisional Head & others --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocate for respondents. 3. According to petitioner, she has made representation to the competent authority in Punjab National Bank regarding executing a lease agreement. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Punjab National Bank has occupied more area than what was proposed to be leased out. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the bank submits that if petitioner has any grievance, then she can make representation to the competent authority. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioner to make representation to Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Haldwani. If she makes such representation within one week from today, decision thereupon shall be taken, as per law, after passing a reasoned order, within three weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.08.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21CE 5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.14 19:33:29 +05'30'