Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 963 (JK)

SHABIR AHMAD BEIGH v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT)

WP(C)/973/2026 · 2026-05-05

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 154 Supp. Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 973/2026 SHABIR AHMAD BEIGH ……...Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Arfat Rashid Lone, Adv. Versus UT OF J&K AND ORS. .……Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 05.05.2026 1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied in case the instant writ petition is treated as a representation and is accorded consideration within a reasonable period. 2. On asking of the Court, Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned Dy. AG, caused appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and he is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition by treating the same as representation. 3. Since an innocuous prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is taken up for disposal at the very threshold by directing respondents 1 and 2 to treat the instant writ petition as a representation and to accord consideration thereto within a period of four weeks from the date copy of this order, along with the writ petition, is made available to the said respondents, in the light of the averments made therein, strictly in accordance with the rules and applicable law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in the manner indicated above. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE Srinagar 05.05.2026 Sakeena