Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9629 (UTT)

JANKI DEVI v. COMMISSIONER GOODS AND SERVICES TAX STATE GST

WPMB/339/2026 · 2026-08-13

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010072432026 2026:UHC:7200-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY 13th August, 2026 WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 339 OF 2026 Janki Devi -------Petitioner Versus 1. Commissioner, Goods And Services Tax State GST, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. 2. State Tax Officer Ramnagar, Nainital, Uttarakhand. 3. Assistant Commissioner State GST, Ramnagar, Nainital, Uttarakhand. --Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Tarun Pande, learned counsel. Counsel for the respondents : Ms. Puja Banga, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. JUDGMENT : (PER: SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) 1. The GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled on 10.10.2024 on ground of non-filing of the returns. The petitioner applied for revocation of the order of cancellation of GST registration. She was issued a Show Cause Notice dated 24.03.2025, by which the application was proposed to be rejected for the following reason:- “1. Reason for revocation of cancellation-Others (Please specify)-Annual Return GSTR-4 form 2022-23 to 2023-24 are not filed. Kindly file all your pending return (GSTR-4 and CMP-08) first.” 2. The application was ultimately rejected on 16.06.2025 for reason that the petitioner had not replied to the notice. 3. The case of the petitioner, as set-out in the supplementary affidavit, is that the petitioner has now filed the annual returns for the financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 and UKHC010072432026 2026:UHC:7200-DB 2 the copies thereof have been annexed along with the supplementary affidavit. It is, thus, submitted that the deficiency, on account of which the application was rejected, has now been made good and, therefore, the prayer has been made that the respondent-Department be directed to revisit the entire matter considering the fact that the petitioner has now filed the returns. 4. Ms. Puja Banga, learned counsel for the Department, very fairly does not oppose the said prayer and, accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Department along with evidence to show that the petitioner had filed the returns in respect of the period specified in the Show Cause Notice dated 24.03.2025 and, whereupon, the proper officer of the Department shall take an appropriate decision within next three weeks. 5. All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly. _____________________ MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. ___________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. Dt: 13th August, 2026 Rathour PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Digitally signed by PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=23699ccc2fd40ad81b6fd13323779d9e3aeb1097d17 dbb53d481cabd25946eed, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=1F65499E931DF71CDAF92A40CC6179B8E0103 31BA695239171F906FD5C45C4E8, cn=PRAVINDRA SINGH RATHOUR Date: 2026.08.17 14:34:49 +05'30'