Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9629 (CHH)

PRAMOD PATHAK v. THE COLLECTOR

WPC/2122/2026 · 2026-04-29

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2122 of 2026 1 - Pramod Pathak S/o Late Ganesh Prasad Pathak Aged About 62 Years R/o Gali No. 3, Kashyap Colony, Old Bus Stand, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - The Additional Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Tahsildar Tahsil And District Bilaspur, (C.G.) 4 - The Superintendent Of Land Records Collectorate Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Record Keeper/copying Section Incharge, Office Of Tahsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title as taken from CIS periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/04/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.05.02 11:01:21 +0530 2 “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus, thereby directing the respondent authorities to supply the order dated 05.12.1995 passed by the Additional Collector, Bilaspur, M.P. in Revenue Case No.2/A-29/94- 95 parties being ‘State vs. Ganesh Prasad’, along with Map, Nistar Patrak of Khaira and Mopka villages as wellas Misal of Khaira village for verification of revenue entries and further legal proceedings. 10.2 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper be awarded in favor of the petitioner, including the cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the State-Respondents submits that, upon tracing the records available with them, the same shall be supplied to the petitioner, and the grievance of the petitioner shall be redressed within a period of 45 days from today. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Rukhsar