Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:1402 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Revision No. 58 of 2025
1. Sonika Kumari, aged about 36 years, W/o Sri Sujit Kumar Tudu, D/o Nand Lal Manjhi
2. Raj Nandni Tudu, aged about 2 years, D/o Sri Sujit Kumar Tudu (petitioner no.2 is minor and is represented by her mother/petitioner no.1), permanent resident of Village- Santa Tola Lahtand, P.O. Ghatiyali, P.S. Pindrajora, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand, present residents of Qrs. No.1737, A Road, Sector-9/D, P.O. Sector-9, P.S. Harla, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand
… Petitioners
-Versus-
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Sujit Kumar Tudu, S/o Late Sita Ram Manjhi, present resident of Qrs. No.M.S./41, P.O. Punidih, P.S. Putki, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand, permanent resident of Village- Barudih, P.O. Pargha, P.S. Baliapur, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand, Office address (i) The Additional GM, H.R. Bhel, Ramchandrapuram, Hyderabad, Telangana, (ii) The Executive Director, PE & SD, Bhel, Ramchandrapuram, Hyderabad, Telangana
… Opposite Parties
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Spl.P.P. For O.P. No.2
: Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
-----
08/20.01.2026 This criminal revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 13.09.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Original Maintenance Case No.116/2020.
2. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on instruction of Mr. Gautam Kumar, who is Advocate-on-Record, seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the State and opposite party no.2 have got no objection.
4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 20th January, 2026 Ajay/