Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 96244 (MAD)

Sundarraj v. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police

CRL OP(MD)/21758/2025 · 2026-02-19

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD) NO. 21758 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD) NO. 21758 of 2025 1. Sundarraj 2. PERUMAL 3. KAMALAM 4. GANESAN 5. RAVI 6. UMAMAHESWARI 7. VIJAYAKUMAR 8. VIJAYAKUMAR Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Rural, Dindigul District. 2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul District. In Crime No. Not Known/2025 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.C. Susikumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (crl. side) 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD) NO. 21758 of 2025 Prayer: C-24 AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not Knonwn/2025 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that no CSR number or FIR has been registered against the petitioners. 2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands closed. 19-02-2026 KSA To 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Rural, Dindigul District. 2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police Thadicombu Police Station, Dindigul District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis