Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9624 (HP)

MANSA RAM v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANR

COPC/479/2026 · 2026-05-11

Romesh Verma

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 479 of 2026 Date of decision : 11.05.2026 Mansa Ram ...Petitioner. Versus Nipun Jindal & Anr. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar & Rakesh Kumar Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. __________________________________________ Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 2480 of 2025, dated 05.03.2025. 2. The Court had issued notice on 8th May, 2026. 3. Today learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record communication dated 24.11.2025 as addressed by Financial Advisor & C.A.O Himachal Road Transport Corporation Shimla, to the present petitioner regarding payment of arrear on account of DA/IR. As per communication it has been stated that no arrear for the year 2016 to 30.09.2018 is due towards the petitioner and consequently the case of the petitioner has been rejected. 4. It is found that no arrears for the year 2016 to 30.09.2018 is due as per the decision taken by the respondents. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 5. Consequently, in view of the aforesaid communication, the present petition is ordered to be closed. 6. At this stage learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to him to avail appropriate remedy in the competent Court of law for redressal of his grievance. Liberty granted. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. (Romesh Verma) May 11, 2026 Judge (Veena)