Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9621 (ALL)

DIPOO KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/21169/2026 · 2026-09-22

Vivek Saran

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 21169 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. Re: Civil Misc. Amendment Application No.2 of 2026 1. For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, this application is allowed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the prayer during course of the date. Order on petition 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner in the instant petition presses the prayer for deciding the restoration/tajbisani application which is stated to be pending before respondent no.4/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi expeditiously. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents does not have any objection to the above prayer. 3. In such view of the matter, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the Respondent No.4/Additional Commissioner (Administration), Varanasi to decide the restoration/tajbisani application of the petitioner, if not already decided, expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order provided there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2026 Deepika Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Pandey, Jitendra Pandey, Pragya Pandey, Shambhavi Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) Dipoo Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad