Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9620 (UTT)

MOHD QAIUEM v. NAGAR NIGAM ROORKEE

WPSS/2246/2026 · 2026-08-25

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010149672026 2026:UHC:7696 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2246/2026 Mohd Qaiuem --Petitioner Versus Nagar Nigam Roorkee --Respondent Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Parikshi Saini, learned counsel holding brief of Ms. Shazia Parveen, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Lalit Miglani, learned counsel for the respondent- Nagar Nigam through V.C. 3. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order dated 10.08.2026 (Annexure No.4 to the writ petition) whereby the respondent-Nagar Nigam under the hands of its Tax Superintendent has made an application to the In charge Kotwali, Civil Line Roorkee, to lodged a First Information Report against the petitioner. Since the application has been filed to lodged an FIR, therefore, the writ petition cannot be said to be maintainable before this Court. Petitioner may challenge the FIR. 4. Accordingly, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, the writ petition is dismissed accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.08.2026 Nahid UKHC010149672026 2026:UHC:7696