Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9619 (ALL)

JAY PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

SPLAD/595/2023 · 2026-09-22

Saumitra Dayal Singh, Swarupama Chaturvedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 595 of 2023 Court No. - 39 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the original petitioner/appellant, Sri Yogesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the original petitioner/appellant states that during pendency of this intra-Court appeal against the order of learned single judge dated 23.06.2023 in Jay Prakash Vs. State of U.P. And 5 Others, 2023:AHC:128467, the disciplinary proceedings have been concluded. The original petitioner/appellant has been awarded punishment. He prays for leave of the Court, to challenge the same. 3. The above prayer made by learned counsel for the original petitioner/appellant is unopposed. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the original petitioner/appellant to assail the penalty order. September 23, 2026 #Vikram/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Anil Kumar, Pradyumn Kumar, Rajan, Sanjay Srivastava, Subhas Kumar, Virendra Kumar Yadav, Virendra Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Yogesh Kumar Singh (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Jay Prakash .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad