Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9617 (ALL)

SUSHIL KUMAR KHANNA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/38181/2026 · 2026-09-22

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38181 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the NOIDA Authority. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to forthwith execute the order dated 17.04.2026 bearing No. Noida/Niyojan/2026/18 and remove/demolish the unauthorised construction raised by Respondent No. 5 in the rear setback of Plot No. D-07, Sector 40, Noida, and restore the setback in accordance with the sanctioned building map and applicable regulations; b) direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to forthwith inspect and measure Plot No. D-07 and place on record a measured site plan and photographs recording the construction and deviations presently existing thereon; c) restrain the Respondent No. 5, his agents, contractors and representatives from carrying out any further construction or reconstruction at Plot No. D-07, Sector 40, Noida, contrary to the sanctioned building plan and applicable regulations; d) restrain the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 from sanctioning or approving any fresh, revised or amended building plan in respect of the offending construction at Plot No. D-07; e) direct the Respondent No. 2 to consider and take appropriate action in accordance Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vikash Bhatnagar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kaushalendra Nath Singh Sushil Kumar Khanna And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) with law under Section 14 of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, in view of the violations committed by Respondent No. 5; and f) award the costs of this petition to the petitioners; and g) pass such other and further order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case." 3. Sri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel appearing for the NOIDA Authority, states that if the petitioners move a fresh representation with all their grievances then the same shall be decided in accordance with law. 4. Without going into the merits of the case, we direct that if the petitioners represent before the respondent no. 2, NOIDA Authority through its Chief Executive Officer, Main Administrative Building, Sector-96, NOIDA, Gautam Buddh Nagar, within a period of one week from today then the same shall be decided in accordance with law within a period of two weeks thereafter. 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 M.S. Ansari WRIC No. 38181 of 2026 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad