Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9616 (AP)

Raghavendra Iron and General Merchant v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLRC/1164/2019 · 2026-09-14

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010362752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1164/2019 Between: 1. RAGHAVENDRA IRON AND GENERAL MERCHANT, REP. BY ITS PROP. GUDURI NAGAMANI, W/O.SEETHARAMAIAH, HINDU, 60 YEARS, NSC BOSE ROAD, TANUKU TOWN AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI. 2. KASANI SATYANARAYANA, S/O.KRISHNA MURTHY, HINDU, BUSINESS, AGED 52 YEARS, TADIPARRU VILLAGE, UNDRAJAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. GUDURI NAGAMANI, W/O.SEETHARAMAIAH, HINDU, 60 YEARS, NSC BOSE ROAD, TANUKU TOWN AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 submit that Accused No.2/Respondent No.3, by name Guduri Nagamani, who is the proprietor of Accused No.1/Petitioner No.1, is no more. 3. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 15.09.2026 BMS