[2026:RJ-JP:25062] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1265/2026 URN: CRLAS / 2289U / 2026 Deepak S/o Madanlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Moti Nagar Kherda P.s. Maan Town Dist. Sawai Amdhopur (Raj). (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Accused-Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jitendra Jain Mr. Laxminarayan Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/07/2026 1. This criminal appeal has been filed on behalf of the accused- appellant under Section 14(A) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in connection with FIR No. 149/2026 registered at Police Station Govindgarh District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that the accused-appellant has been falsely implicated in this case and has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-appellant is in custody since long; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-appellant; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served [2026:RJ-JP:25062] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1265/2026] by keeping the accused-appellant in custody and, therefore, prays to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by learned counsel for the accused-appellant hereinabove but did not dispute with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-appellant, the fact that accused-appellant is behind the bars since 27.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-appellant; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without commenting anything on merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. 5. Consequently, this instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 13.05.2026 passed by Special Court, SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sawai Madhopur in Bail Application No. 130/2026 is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Deepak S/o Madanlal be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions; (i) The accused-appellant shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The accused-appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the law. [2026:RJ-JP:25062] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1265/2026] (iii) The accused-appellant shall attend the hearing of the trial Court on the date fixed by the trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-appellant shall be liable to be cancelled. 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant criminal appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. 8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 187/SHIVANI