Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9612 (UTT)

SHIKHA RANA v. DIRECTORATE OF TREASURY

WPSS/2101/2026 · 2026-08-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010139072026 2026:UHC:7079 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/2101/2026 Shikha Rana --Petitioner Versus Directorate Of Treasury and others --Respondents Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. M.C. Pant and Ms. Anupriya Kukreti, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned DAG for the State/respondent nos. 1 and 2. 3. After hearing the parties for quite some time, it appears that there is some clerical mistake in the writ petition, which required to be corrected. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instead of filing an amendment application, he wants the writ petition to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. 5. The permission is granted. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.08.2026 Nahid