IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 552 of 2026 Date of decision : 14.05.2026 Narayan Dutt Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus Aditya Negi ….Contemnor Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Yash P. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. __________________________________________ Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) The present petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the order passed in CWP No. 19687 of 2025 of 2025, dated 05.01.2026. 2. In the pre-lunch Session, Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondent has sought some time to have instructions in the matter 3. Now, he has placed on record calculations with respect to the interest on the retirement gratuity. On instructions, he undertakes that the said amount shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of four weeks from today positively. 4. In view of above statement, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is according closed. However, it is made clear that in case any of the grievances still remains unaddressed, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the present proceedings by filing appropriate application. 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Notice is discharged. (Romesh Verma) May 14, 2026 Judge (Veena)