Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9610 (KAR)

SMT.KOMALADEVI v. SRI.SRINIVASAREDDY @ H.SRINIVAS

WP/25688/2022 · 2026-02-09

Tara Vitasta Ganju

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7607 WP No. 25688 of 2022 - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 25688 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. KOMALADEVI AGED 29 YEARS, W/O SRINIVAS, D/O SHIVANANDA R/AT NO.23/17, BDA 1ST CROSS, NANJAREDDY COLONY, JEEVAN BHIMA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 075. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BOREGOWDA D., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. SRINIVASAREDDY @ H. SRINIVAS S/O LATE HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 2. PRIYA.S D/O SRINIVASA REDDY @ H.SRINIVAS, AGED 30 YEARS, 3. POOJA.S D/O SRINIVASA REDDY @ H.SRINIVASA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT NO.33/12, KRISHNA REDDY LANE, JEEVAN BHEEMA NAGAR, BENGAURU-560075. HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7607 WP No. 25688 of 2022 - 2 - 4. SRI. G.KESHAVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O C.GANGA REDDY, R/AT NO.119, 11TH CROSS, OPP. MAYFLOWER HOTEL, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU-560 027. 5. SMT. R.GANGARAJAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O GANGAREDDY, 6. SRI. G.PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O C.GANGAREDDY, BOTH ARE R/AT 223, 8TH MAIN ROAD, NEAR K J CONVENT, LAKKASANDRA EXTENSION, ADUGODI, BENGALURU-560 030. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KAMBESHA.M., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 [ABSENT]; SRI. B.V.SRINIVAS., ADVOCATE FOR R5 & R6 [ABSENT]; V/O/DT:21.01.2023-NOTICE TO R1 IS DISPENSED WITH; R4-DEAD, R5 & R6 ARE LR’S) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 11.10.2022 PASSED IN OS.NO. 26079/2018 BY THE 72ND ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7607 WP No. 25688 of 2022 - 3 - ORAL ORDER 1. On the last date of hearing, an adjournment was sought for by the petitioner. Today, the matter has been passed over on two occasions. However, despite two pass overs, an adjournment sought once again by the petitioner’s counsel. 2. It is clear that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter. 3. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending applications stand closed. (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE YN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5 Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA