2026:JHHC:1708 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 334 of 2026 1. Baldev Saw, S/o Lakshman Saw, aged about 68 years, 2. Rajdendra Saw, S/o Lxman Saw, aged about 48 years, 3. Ritlal Saw, S/o Laxman Saw, aged about 50 years, 4. Liliya Devi, W/o Lt. Laxman Saw, aged about 80 years, 5. Tuplal Saw, S/o Fhagu Saw, aged about 36 years, 6. Dewan Saw, S/o Kamal Saw, aged about 54 years, 7. Diliya Devi, W/o Gajadhar Saw, aged about 53 years, 8. Fulchand Saw, S/o Fagu Saw, aged about 45 years, All are resident of Village- Jamuatand, Khukhra, P.O. & P.S.- Khukhra, Dist.- Giridih. … Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Guda Saw, Son of Late Karmu Saw, Resident of Village- Jamuatand, Khukhra, P.O. & P.S. – Khukhra, Dist.- Giridih. … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P. ----- 02/22.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No. 189 of 2023, registered for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 of the IPC, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the false allegation has been made against the petitioners for selling the land of the informant. It is next submitted that in the mutation case, Ld. L.R.D.C. has said that the land is belonging to the petitioner and as observed that if other side are having any objection they can settle their dispute by filing of a civil suit, and he also submits that the Annexure-2 is the order of the Ld. L.R.D.C. Court, Giridih (T), 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation are there of selling the land of the informant. 2026:JHHC:1708 2 5. Considering the observation made by the Ld. L.R.D.C. as pointed out that the land belongs to the petitioners which can be sold by them and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Giridih (T) P.S. Case No. 189 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 22nd January, 2026 Vedanti/-