BALBEER SINGH LOLDIYAL AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPSS/110/2026 · 2026-02-16
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 961 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 961 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:990 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/110/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. M.C. Upadhyay, Advocate for the petitioners.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Petitioners are serving as Deputy Forest Range Officer under Uttarakhand Government. They have challenged the final seniority list, issued by Chief Conservator of Forest, Human Resource Development, on
20.11.2025.
4. Learned State Counsel raised objection that petitioners are public servants, therefore, they have the remedy of approaching the Tribunal constituted under U.P. Public Service (Tribunals) Act, 1976, thus, his writ petition is not maintainable.
5. This Court finds substance in the objection raised by learned State Counsel.
6. Petitioners have raised a seniority dispute, which can very well be resolved by learned Tribunal. Moreover, there are disputed questions of fact involved in the writ petition, which cannot appropriately be adjudicated in a writ petition.
7. In such view of the matter, Registry is directed to transmit the complete record of this case to learned Tribunal for adjudication after keeping photocopy thereof on record.
8. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
16.02.2026 Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4 e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D0 95C6ED9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.02.16 17:47:52 +05'30'