Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 96077 (MAD)

Muthuseeman C v. The Principal District Judge

WP(MD)/34411/2025 · 2026-02-18

G Jayachandran, K K Ramakrishnan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.02.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 C.Muthuseeman ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Principal District Judge Theni 2.The Chief Judicial Magistrate Theni 3.The Judicial Magistrate Theni ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass order on the petitioner's reply dated 22.08.2025 within a time to be stipulated by this Court. ____________ p. 2 W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sivaji For Respondents : Mr.K.Samidurai Standing Counsel O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] This writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the third respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's reply dated 22.08.2025, which was made in response to the show cause notice. 2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, submitted that the reply of the petitioner has been considered by the respondents and it has been rejected. Subsequently, charges, under Section 17(b) of Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, have been framed against the petitioner on 29.01.2026 and it has also been served on the petitioner on 30.01.2026 and the petitioner has been granted 21 days time to submit his explanation to the charge memo. ____________ p. 3 W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 3. In view of the above submission, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that some more time may be granted to the petitioner to submit his explanation to the charge memo. 5. Considering the fact the petitioner has not given his explanation to the charge memo pending outcome of this writ petition, we grant time to the petitioner till 03.03.2026 to respond to the charge memo. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. [G.J., J.] [K.K.R.K., J.] 18.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No krk ____________ p. 4 W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 To: 1.The Principal District Judge, Theni. 2.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Theni. 3.The Judicial Magistrate, Theni. ____________ p. 5 W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. krk W.P.(MD) No.34411 of 2025 18.02.2026 ____________