Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 96056 (MAD)

Rengaraju v. Marudambal (Died) 2.Nagalakshmi

CMP(MD)/18980/2025 · 2026-01-22

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NOS. 18980 to 18982 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NOS. 18980 to 18982 of 2025 in AS(MD) NO. 158 of 2016 Rengaraju Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs 1.Marudambal (Died) 2.Nagalakshmi 3.Paramayee 4.Sellammal 5.Dhanapal 6.Chitra (Died) 7.Kasthuri 8.Balasubramanian 9.Shanmugam 10.Kasiraja 11.Sethupathy 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 18980 to 18982 of 2025 12.Dhanush Kumar Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.T.Leninkumar, Advocate For Respondent(s) in all petitions : No Appearance Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed to condone the delay of 2570 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 6th respondent viz., Chitra, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 6th respondent viz. Chitra, and to bring on record respondent Nos.11 and 12 as legal heirs of the deceased 6th respondent viz. Chitra and rank them as respondent Nos.11 & 12 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.158 of 2016. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 2570 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 6th respondent viz., Chitra, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased 6th respondent viz. Chitra, and to bring on record respondent Nos.11 and 12 as legal heirs of the deceased 6th respondent viz. Chitra and rank them as respondent 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 18980 to 18982 of 2025 Nos.11 & 12 in the Appeal Suit in A.S.(MD)No.158 of 2016, pending on the file of this Court. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3. There is no representation for the 2nd respondent. 4. The names of respondent Nos.11 and 12 have been printed in the cause list. 5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 22-01-2026 Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum and list the same after two weeks. mkn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 18980 to 18982 of 2025 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NOS. 18980 to 18982 of 2025 in AS(MD) NO. 158 of 2016 22.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis