Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9604 (AP)

MAGULURI SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8470/2024 · 2026-09-01

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010166232024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8470/2024 Between: 1. MAGULURI SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, S/O.MAGULURI SOLOMON RAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.23-7-3/1, PLOT NO.8, MUNICIPAL COLONY, RAJAHMUNDRY UBRAN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-533105. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT AT GUNTUR. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIVISIONAI SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THULLUR, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THULLUR POLICE STATION, THULLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICERCUM SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THULLUR POLICE STATION, THULLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 4 and 5 calling the Petitioner to the Thulluru Police Station, Thulluru village and Mandal of Guntur District and interfering in his personal life and liberty, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without Jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to summon the Petitioner to the Station House Officer, Thulluru Police Station, Thulluru Village and Mandal of Guntur District and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4 and 5 not to interfere in any manner with the personal life and liberty of petitioner otherwise than any known procedure established by law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, particularly 4 and 5 not to insist the petitioner to appear before their authority nor interfere with the petitioner personal liberty and life otherwise than due procedure established by law, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8470 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: Instant Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly 4 and 5 calling the Petitioner to the Thulluru Police Station, Thulluru village and Mandal of Guntur District and interfering in his personal life and liberty, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without Jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to summon the Petitioner to the Station House Officer, Thulluru Police Station, Thulluru Village and Mandal of Guntur District and consequently direct the respondents, particularly 4 and 5 not to interfere in any manner with the personal life and liberty of petitioner otherwise than any known procedure established by law and pass….” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Chalasani Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the respondent-police are calling the petitioner to the respondent No.5 without any legal cause. 3. Conversely, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home categorically states that the respondent-police have not threatened the petitioner, as asserted by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the writ affidavit. 4 4. In view of the submissions made by the respective counsel, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent-police not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner without there being any specific legal cause. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 02.09.2026 RMR 5 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 8470 of 2024 Date: 02.09.2026 RMR