Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 9603 (RAJ)

PARSA KENTE COLLIERIES LIMITED (PKCL) v. RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT UTPADAN NIGAM LTD. (RVUNL)

ARBAP/125/2025 · 2026-07-03

Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:24903] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Arbitration Application No. 125/2025 URN: ARBAP / 188U / 2025 Parsa Kente Collieries Limited (PKCL), Through Authorized Signatory Having Its Registered Office At Plot No. 25, Yushisthat Marg, C Scheme, Jaipur-5, Presently Having Its Registered Office At S-20, Mahima Triniti, Plot No. 05, Swej Farm, New Sanganer Road, Jaipur 302019 (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. (Rvunl), Having Its Registered Office At Vidyut Bhawan, Jan Path, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-5, Presently Having The Office At Dreamax Plaza, 2Nd Floor, Room No. 201, Sahkar Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur 302005, Through Its Add. Chief Engineer (Fuel) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak Ms. Neelama Bandhopadhaya through V.C. Ms. Jaya P. Pathak Ms. Shefali Sharma Mr. Aditya Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kartik Seth, Adv. Mr. Ragib, Adv. HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order 03/07/2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. This Court notes the nature of the dispute and that in a similar case already an arbitrator has been appointed. Although, this Court has given time to the respondents to file reply, however, the same has not yet been filed. Let the respondents file a reply before the Arbitrator. [2026:RJ-JP:24903] (2 of 2) [ARBAP-125/2025] Having noticed that in similar matter of dispute, the Arbitrator was already appointed by the Court, accordingly, this Court appoints Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Mishra, Former Chief Justice, Rajasthan High Court and Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, R/o 13, Akbar Road, New Delhi to act as the Sole Arbitrator and to decide all issues without prejudice to the rights and contentions raised in the present application and in the reply. The arbitration fees shall be determined in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act of 1996, as amended. The fee of the Arbitrator will be equally borne by both the parties. 4. The Arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as per the time limit specified under Section 29A of the Act of 1996. 5. The arbitration application is allowed accordingly. 6. Copy of this order is to be sent to the appointed Sole Arbitrator. (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ 38/AMAN